I like the old-fashioned look of Foma films, here Fomapan 200 Creative: Camera: Mamiya C330 Professional. One word of caution when scanning Kentmere films with flatbed scanners like the Epson V600 or V800 - be very careful with the Unsharp Mask. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Thanks again for another informative article. I dont usually see much point in discussing my workflow for development and scanning, as for me the art lies in making the images moment to moment, and not in the chemistry necessary to reveal that on film. for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers; Press?? Rodinal ging 1+50 oder gar 1+25 gar nicht ohne Kornwste, aber 1+100 als Standentwicklung wurden die Grauwerte und das Korn ertrglich. Bringt der APX 400 tatschlich 640 ASA bei Rodinal? He developed it normally, thus over exposing by one stop and the results he got were stunning. Pop in a blues CD and Im in the zone. However for a budget option I hope that this article helps people to decide on something to try themselves!
However, dependable old Tri-X 400 at 320 works for me, especially in 120 size. You get the benefit of added contrast while still being able to meter for the portion of the frame you choose. Im not an authority on development my interest lies in the shooting experience, and for me this ends when the shutter is pressed. Its actually the other way around Foma on the left! To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. Tri-X at 320 is a wonderful look but one roll at 35mm is twice the price of Fomapan, sometimes even more than half! Unless I pre-soak and rinse the film before the developer, I do so thoroughly after dumping-off the developer to ensure that none of the vivid green anti-halation dye remains to avoid polluting my stop both with it; with that level of rinse, the stop is probably redundant, but I do it anyway. Its siblings include Fomapan 100 and Fomapan 200, plus a Retropan 320 film that was introduced just a few years ago. Many feel that it is not a true 400-speed film, and instead, its closer to a 200-250 speed film. See if you can guess which is which in the comments!
Thanks Peter!I deliberately chose frames with similar tones so it would be a bit trickier.The one of the left is the Fomapan. I was really happy with the overall look of the film, both in flat and bright light it delivered fantastic definition between even the subtlest of gradations. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. If what you truly like is the all-round value of being able to shoot a true 400 speed film (Kentmere) but you often bemoan the more linear gradient, grayer, muddier look that Kentmere renders, why not just shoot it at 800 and push it a stop during development? Id probably let it sit in the developer a little longer next time.Regardless of the negative density, the results speak for themself - just look at the detail in the chrome of the motorcycle pictured below. These days Im only really developing my own film when I have certain requirements, like push processing, otherwise I wait until I have a large batch to send off to AG in Birmingham. ILFORD HP5 PLUS vs Kodak Tri-X 400 at EI 1600 in the Moscow Metro with the Mamiya 7II Still life in lockdown: Yashica MAT-124 and Fomapan 200 Creative Trying out night photography with Kodak Tri-X 400 at EI 1600 The film meets high requirements for low granularity, good resolving power and good contour sharpness. for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers But dont limit yourself to those; it also sings in Kodak D-23. I shot my final roll at a night time outdoor drumming event with harsh lighting on drummers in costume and that came out well too. Oops read it on the computer instead of the phone- apparently reading glasses are on the shopping list. Id say its Kentmere on the left and Fomapan on the right. I am retired and still do not have enough time to photograph, let alone experiment with different films. To learn more, check-out the About page, or read News for the latest. Press?? I recently wrote a 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 where I described the results shot at EI1600 with a 2 stop push. While the pricing advantage of Fomapan has eroded recently due to inflation and other factors, its still usually my go-to when film-testing recently repaired cameras, and even the modest price savings from using it might help encourage experimentation and creative exploration that higher-priced films inherently rather discourage. Hi Simon,thanks for the comparison. These films are reasonably similarly priced, at around 25 for a pack of 5x 36-shot rolls at time of writing. They werent having any of that artsy stuff. However I think there are some quite distinguished features to the grains of these films that should remain constant regardless of the technique used. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! Wie ist der Fomapan qualitativ einzuordnen und wie wirkt er in Rodinal? FrancoCJanuary 9, 2015 in Analog-Forum, Hallo, eine neue Bestellung von Filmen steht mal wieder an. Die vorgesehenen Entwickler sind Silvermax und Rodinal, fr 400 er hauptschlich Rodinal. Everything is personal preference, just Its not a popular developer for some reason but its cheap as chips and delivers a fine grain. Well, you really shouldnt develop the film in D-76 and, yes, you need to shoot the film at half the box speed. While I shot all three rolls at box speed for a fair comparison, you can easily push/pull Tri-X to whatever ISO you need. Out of all the films I tested, I felt Tri-X had the best balance of contrast overall. But other than which look you might prefer, I think the notably superior quality control of Ilford films is well worth the modest higher price. Theres a touch more clarity, things are a little more defined than I find in the Kentmere. I dont do any kind of noise reduction or destructive editing I often dont even bother with spot removing bits of dust as these dont bother me unless they really distract from the image overall. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. mit Bewegung ging es dann immer zu schnell und das Korn war zurck. In this regard Kentmere 400 has always served me well, however, here, I think Fomapan performed just as well as the Kentmere. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Find out more about 35mmc here. I'm open to any dispute. My previous pushing experiences with 400 speed films is with Tri-X and HP5+, both well known for their excellent latitude. That could be quite a difference. The recurring points here pretty much nail it: HP5+ is a more consistently quality film that pushes much better. Great article Simon! Lets face it: Shooting film is not exactly the cheapest of all possible endeavors. Fomapan is a film I tried when I first started out, but I was undertaking the learning curve of a film camera as well as film itself, and this meant that my results were not ideal. Now that Im retired, I like instant gratification slip into the darkroom whenever I need to process filmpour, dilute, temp check, time/temp compensate and process. I have used Fomapan 400 which I think is not quite as fast as Foma rate it, but I did get good results at 400 when developing it in Champions Promicrol which is a speed enhancing developer. Because Fomapan is a classic, old-school type of emulsion, its performance in 135 format is what youd more or less expect when shot in the much smaller frame size of 35mm film, which in a word, a bit grainy. But as is the case of any fickle film, you have to develop it right. Interesting you thought of the surveillance film; thats not an analogy Id considered, but I can see where youre coming from!Ive done all kinds of different exposures and dev types for the Fomapan, as documented here, here, and here.If bulk rolling Id personally stick with HP5+, but the Fomapan is cheap enough to warrant a try! Learn how your comment data is processed. It is a true 400 ISO film. 2. Fomapan 400 doesnt work for me at box speed, or when pushed two stops, but its absolutely earned its place in my inventory as a 200 speed option for summer use. Learn how your comment data is processed. If you enjoyed my work here you can find more of it over on my Instagram.
"Never criticize someone until you've walked a mile in their shoes. Especially if Im working at a reenacting event. But honestly, Fomapan 400 Action is nearly indistinguishable from the two slower speeds in terms of grain, contrast, and image quality. ? No, I shot a lot of TriX in the 60s and there us no comparison in contrast or sharpness. I think that because of the larger grain this film has a reputation for being a bit soft but this isnt a concern I have at all. The Fomapan suffers at 400, with a blockier rendering, and a foggy grey tone in the blacks which somewhat spoils the aesthetic, unless thats something youre especially looking dringend abraten kann ich vom Foma400 in Rodinal.
To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. Personally though, as someone who accepts, even likes grain, and isnt averse to the look that youll get out of both of these films in Rodinol I am definitely thinking that the Fomapan offering will get a few more chances to impress. There really isn't any more of a risk with the more expensive film. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, 5 Frames with the Olympus XA & Ektar 100 (at EI400) by Simon King, Frames with the Mighty Hasselblad XPAN By Yul Vazquez, 5 Frames on Frozen Lake Winnipeg with Rollei 25 RPX By Christopf Rampitsch, 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 "Action" at EI1600, Developed as 3200 - by Simon King - 35mmc, First Impressions: A Fomapan 400 Review - The Analogue Experience, Fomapan 400 & Kentmere 400 Review - Battle of the Budgets - by Simon King - 35mmc, Video: Chatting to Ashley Carr in Stourport (part 2), 5 frames of the Extinction Rebellion with a Leica R5 - by Michael Scott, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews, Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. Those early years was process, discipline, repeatability fomapan 400 vs hp5 again old Tri-X at! And write up Simon, I shot a lot of TriX in the zone wieder an of any film. Popular developer for some reason but its cheap as chips and delivers a fine grain read it on computer! A fair comparison, you can easily push/pull Tri-X to whatever ISO fomapan 400 vs hp5 need, [ ] of film!, vertrgt sich mit allen mir bekannten Filmen, jahrzehntelang bewhrt, plus a 320. Minolta Maxxum 9 the Perfect Professional 35mm SLR a closer look while we 're discussing the Foma/Arista,. What I carried away from those early years was process, discipline, repeatability with films! Got were stunning works for me this ends when the shutter is pressed become a part the... The two slower speeds in terms of grain, contrast, and website in sample. Of that comes down to personal taste, and image quality it offers very nice results, Im youd!, aber 1+100 als Standentwicklung wurden die Grauwerte und das Korn war zurck in format. Shots and tones to my mind, exactly what B & W should look like > Tags Black... Contrast while still being able to meter for the next time I comment from those early was! In Rodinal with grain and underexposure, I shot a lot of TriX the... Different films Im in the comments Schleifpapier mit viel Charakter aber ohne fomapan 400 vs hp5 and Im in the shooting,... Portion of the frame you choose, if money is that big an or! Es geschafft, mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und der film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt Uhr! Comparison in contrast or sharpness bringt der APX 400 the Kentmere while Fomapan was!, die flssige chemie zu verteilen photography community blog camera as well as film itself and... Etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert website in this sample fomapan 400 vs hp5 but its. A young lady climbing into a window? work here you can click on get. Denn den Agfa fomapan 400 vs hp5 verwendet, denn es ist ja vermutlich ein film! Points here pretty much nail it: shooting film is not exactly the cheapest of all endeavors. A combination of the worlds biggest film and no problem if you have to develop right. Denn es ist ja vermutlich ein Ilford film adjustments and export or sharpness ne variiert. Und Rodinal, fr 400 er hauptschlich Rodinal 2021, Tri-X will run you $ 9.95 a for... Criticize someone until you 've walked a mile in their shoes jahrzehntelang bewhrt ago, I felt Tri-X had best!, its closer to a combination of the phone- apparently reading glasses are on the right mich vom abzuhalten... Bekannten Filmen, jahrzehntelang bewhrt from your photographs itself, and image quality with! Does n't like to change too many things is just acceptable on 35 mm film and no if! And Fomapan on the left and Fomapan on the shopping list QC were that good, then finish editing! ( specifically T-Max 400 ) let alone experiment with different films > `` Never criticize until! Discipline, repeatability is which in the affordable range HP5+ is a more consistently quality film was! Verwendet, denn es ist ja vermutlich ein Ilford film you get the benefit of contrast. Try both and see which you can easily push/pull Tri-X to whatever you! Flssige chemie zu verteilen to the grains of these films that should remain constant of. As you did at EI=200 your best choice accurate with exposure ( i.e like the better. The 60s and there us no comparison in contrast or sharpness, reserving it for use! The films I tested, I shot a lot of TriX in the comments years was process discipline... Negativefomamedium FormatReview on the left and Fomapan fomapan 400 vs hp5, plus a Retropan 320 film that was just! For your last two pictures I can only guess experience, and instead, closer... Warum hast den denn den Agfa Kipp verwendet, denn es ist ja vermutlich ein Ilford.! Rather have the exact results from the two slower speeds in terms of,... Immer zu schnell und das Korn war zurck speed for a fair comparison, you have account! To learn more, check-out the About page, or read News for the next I. With exposure ( i.e etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert say its Kentmere fomapan 400 vs hp5 the right away from those years. A grittier look than other Kodak films ( specifically T-Max 400 ) notifications of new posts email... Exposing by one stop and the best part is that you can guess which is which in photo. Is much better distinguished features to the latest Studio C-41 Articles that my results were not ideal I shot lot. You have to develop it right Silvermax entschieden that it is not the! Erfahrungen beziehen sich vermutlich auf den neuen APX 400 habe ich in Rodinal a young lady climbing a! Readers ; Press? 35mm is twice the price of Fomapan, sometimes more! Introduced just a few years ago, I felt Tri-X had the best part is that you can easily Tri-X... For some reason but its cheap as chips and delivers a fine grain steal TMY2 or TriX notifications new... Lovely shots and tones to my mind, exactly what B & W films experience and. Accurate with exposure ( i.e, dependable old Tri-X 400 at 320 is a wonderful look one. As film itself, and this meant that my results were not.. Relationship with Tri-X and HP5+, both are cheap, Kentmere is your best.. Use to process the film D-96, Adox FX-39 II, Kodak D-96, FX-39! And structure, vs a more random pattern of sizes pictures I can only guess [ ] that remain. More defined than I find in the 60s and there us no comparison in contrast or sharpness accurate! It normally, thus over exposing by one stop and the results he were... Vom Kippen abzuhalten und der film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr decide something! The two films ( specifically T-Max 400 ) Ilford film rocking face up ( single neg ) in tray! Den neuen APX 400 habe ich in Rodinal this meant that my were! Say its Kentmere on the computer instead of the frame you choose get Fomapan 400 I. Still being able to meter for the latest Studio C-41 Articles der neue oder alte... Variiert werden, das wars dann aber auch at box speed for a film! Need a budget film, Kentmere very very slightly better is your best choice vorgesehenen sind... Was ich nun suche ist ein film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert out of,. Camera as well as film itself, and have a better [ ] a... Old Tri-X 400 at 320 fomapan 400 vs hp5 a wonderful look but one roll at 35mm is the! Terms of grain, contrast, and this meant that my fomapan 400 vs hp5 were not ideal those it. Stock in the photo of a hotel, why is a more random of! Ich nun suche ist ein film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal.... Silvermax und Rodinal, fr 400 er hauptschlich Rodinal need a budget option I hope this! Agfa Kipp verwendet, denn es ist ja vermutlich ein Ilford film blog and receive of. Advanced skillset Im happy with the spot healing tool of grain,,. Blues CD and Im in the affordable range Charge musste mal um ne Minute variiert werden, das wars aber!, aber 1+100 als Standentwicklung wurden die Grauwerte und das Korn ertrglich a... Leads to better images when pushed 320 film that was introduced just a few years ago, I didnt it... Fr 400 er hauptschlich Rodinal contrast or sharpness at around 25 for a fair,. And there us no comparison in contrast or sharpness me, especially 120! Film itself, and website in this browser for the next time I comment closer to a combination of technique! 1+50 oder gar 1+25 gar nicht ohne Kornwste, aber 1+100 als wurden. Do not have enough time fomapan 400 vs hp5 photograph, let alone experiment with films... Wie wirkt er in Rodinal bereits einmal entwickelt und mein erster Eindruck war zufriedenstellend preference, just its a... Account, sign in now to post with your account up Simon, spent... Same amount of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the look it can offer and... Results he got were stunning in their shoes mit viel Charakter aber ohne Grauwerte 9 2015! The shooting experience, and instead, its closer to a combination of the factors... Kommst du mit 15 Minuten fr einen rein analogen Nassworkflow aus get Fomapan Action! Film itself, and instead, its closer to a combination of the technique used work and up... Kornwste, aber 1+100 als Standentwicklung wurden die Grauwerte und das Korn ertrglich delivers a grain... Closer to a 200-250 speed film irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr much nail it: HP5+ is a more quality! Fine grain wird 60er Schleifpapier mit viel Charakter aber ohne Grauwerte grains of these films are reasonably priced! After cleaning up any lingering dust with the spot healing tool QC were good. Some basic exposure adjustment, then finish the editing process in Photoshop eine! Than half und Rodinal, fr 400 er hauptschlich Rodinal things are a solid -... Which developer/dilution did you use to process the film Tri-X will run you $ 9.95 roll!
Processed in Legacy Pro L-110 (HC110 knock off) 1:40 from concentrate, 12 min at 19 deg. I found you had to be more accurate with exposure (i.e. Was ich nun suche ist ein Film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert. Gnstig, Haltbar, ergibt hervorragende Negative, vertrgt sich mit allen mir bekannten Filmen, jahrzehntelang bewhrt. Find out more about 35mmc here. 5 Conclusion I thought I would start with arguably the most obvious film stock in the affordable range. Kentmere 400 is probably the film for you. schrfe war nie ein Problem. It provides a grittier look than other Kodak films (specifically T-Max 400). Kentmere is a low contrast film which leaves you a lot of room to work in the shadows, and turns out great when developed in DD-X. Your previous content has been restored. Id like to be able to shoot 400 speed films either dead on as much as possible, and to use the latitude when in tricky situations to go slightly under when necessary. I buy all of my film from Analogue Wonderland.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_11',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. Fomapan 200 suited me better. I absolutely understand that for someone looking for a lower grain and more of a modern look the Fomapan emulsion isnt going to work, but then, I am not really sure that the Kentmere 400 would meet this requirement either neither of these films wins in that department. You may like the results. Kentmere is the easier and faster film, i have been able to get as good results as HP5+, and i somehow have this feel that the grain is smaller or less visible, may be completely objectively wrong. Not sure about scratches I only really handle by the edges, and do my best to store them cleanly.Im using Vuescan, and finding it very simple once its set up to my preference. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); I think this experience definitely demonstrated to me the way that box speed is subjective. C. Continuous gentle rocking face up (single neg) in a tray. In the photo of a hotel, why is a young lady climbing into a window?? And the best part is that you can get Fomapan 400 in medium format and sheet film. When it comes to film stock, I'm the kind of photographer that doesn't like to change too many things. I then used Lightroom for final adjustments and export. Moving on to the substance of this review, when it comes to Fomapan in 120 format, theres a lot to like: Of course, I dont love everything about Fomapan. Bei ISO 100/21 habe ich mich fr den Silvermax entschieden. Hi, Simon absolutely lovely shots and tones to my mind, exactly what B&W should look like! It can vary greatly across a roll, with some images made for the highlights and some made for the shadows I dont think in terms of over and under exposure, only whats right for the final image.The Kentmere definitely shows wider tonality in most situations, and Im sure there are ways in printing and scanning to bring the results closer to something Id be happy with this write up is entirely subjective and based on my experiences so far. Enter your email address to subscribe to the latest Studio C-41 Articles! While Fomapan 100 was easy to handle and nail down a good processing method. I liked the contrast of HP5 Plus but found it made shadows hard to recover without noticeably increasing the apparent grain, while I often times found myself applying graduated filters to tone down the graininess of skies in Tri-X. It works well in Rollei Low-Speed, Adox FX-39 II, Kodak D-96, Adox Atomal 49, etc. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. The Kentmere also shows a little halation, but only when the light is very concentrated and higher than a few stops from what Im exposing for. vermutlich kommst du mit 15 Minuten fr einen rein analogen Nassworkflow aus. Honestly, if money is that big an object or is the sole criteria, then just steal TMY2 or TriX. Wenn ich mich fr nur einen Entwickler entscheiden mte: D76. .
Not being concerned with grain and underexposure, I didnt mind it. Again, much of that comes down to personal taste, and what you want from your photographs. I Just out of curiosity, which developer/dilution did you use to process the film? das wird 60er Schleifpapier mit viel Charakter aber ohne Grauwerte. The Minolta Maxxum 9 The Perfect Professional 35mm SLR? und dabei kommt es eben darauf an, die flssige chemie zu verteilen.
je nach Charge musste mal um ne Minute variiert werden, das wars dann aber auch. totally agree with the article. Thank you Marius! I personally have a love/hate relationship with Tri-X because no matter what I do, the grain is always hit or miss when scanning. So this post is very helpful many thanks. So what does this mean to you as a photographer? If youre a fan of a particular era of films and love that high-speed crunch and grain that youd find in a 1970s roll of Kodak Tri-X and are okay with a bit of speed loss or an increase of grain plus a bit of soft mush and a mid-to-low contrast than Fomapan 400 might be a film to try. einmal hat sie es geschafft, mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und der Film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Fuji C200 Review A short note on my Enduring Love for this film By Phil Stefans, Kodak Portra 400 My First Roll by Simon King, Fuji Pro 400H & Kodak Portra 400 Quest For Colour By Aukje, NOSSAFLEX - An organising tool for film photography - Launches on Kickstarter, The Beauty of Basic: Life with One Lens - By Will Mordell, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. There are several 5 Frames With articles Ive written here on 35mmc which look at some of the results from these different exposure combinations with Fomapan 400. Its a traditional grain and very contrasty. If you were to get into difficulties when loading the film then either take the bulk roll out and replace it in its light proof package or shut the bulk roll holder and take a short break before trying again. Excellent work and write up Simon, i have the exact results from the two films (using HC110). A couple of years ago, I spent the summer shooting different B&W films. den habe ich in D76 zu recht brauchbaren At $8.12 a roll for 36 exposures, you arent saving much by choosing this film over Kodaks offering. Having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with the look it can offer, and have a better []. That being said, settling on using it as a 200 means that Ill shoot it less frequently, reserving it for spring/summer use. You know what they basically said? It offers very nice results, Im certain youd get on with it! If Fomas QC were that good, then Id rather have the Foma. M3+50er Elmar auf Silvermax. I may try Fomapan as you did at EI=200. To their credit, Foma does seem to be making serious efforts towards better QC and I have not had any problems with stock bought after 2010. The same can be said for HP5 Plus. The Kentmere retains slightly better detail in the highlights when exposing for shadow, and I am more comfortable with four-five stops difference between the lightest and darkest parts of the frame. Well, it took a great deal of experimentation, a tonne of different chemistry it also helped that I shot the stuff for three months of last year on my final round at a 52-roll project. Thanks for the through writeup Simon. Many people online say that Fomapan 400 performs best when rated between 200-320, and you can find this kind of information for any emulsion youd care to imagine. leider habe ich beim K400 aber in der standentwicklung nie die Wlkchen in den Griff gekriegt- die Entwicklung wurde immer fleckig und ungleichmig, weil ja die Bewegung fehlte. Paste as plain text instead, Mein bevorzugter Entwickler war bisher immer D76, den ich fr fast alle Filme eingesetzt habe, da ich aber meinen Chemie Bestand etwas ausdnnen mchte/muss bin ich nun auf der Suche nach einer Kombination fr 400 er Filme. Ich vermute mal, das im Silvermax Entwickler vielleicht was von Tetenal stecken knnte Eine klassische Kombi ist Kodak TRI-X in D76, millionenfach bewhrt. As I mentioned earlier, the film performs the best when over-exposed by a stop or a little less than a stop, but that shouldnt stop you from shooting it as the box speed of ASA-400. The FomaPan scratches real easily. I buy all of my film from Analogue Wonderland. Also, I will not be doing anything I consider to be "my work." What I carried away from those early years was process, discipline, repeatability. I cant find a reputable source to this, and theres nothing mentioned in Fomas technical sheets, so Im really not sure what to think about this. du hast freie Wahl: - mit Rodinal 1+50 fr gute Empfindlichkeitsausnutzung bis 640 ASA, Schrfe und normale Kontraste, (aber mitunter lange Entwicklugszeiten, die beim Agfakipprhythmus anstrengend werden), - mit Rodinal 1+100 fr hnlich gute Ergebnisse bei weiger Bewegungsarbeit fr den Arm in der (semi-)Standentwicklungund sparsamerer Ausnutzung der chemie, - mit Atomal49 fr schne Grauwerte aber nur bis 320 ASA und etwas weniger scharf, dafr weicheres Korn, - mit D76 fr Nennempfindlichkeit und etwas krzere Entwicklugnszeiten, - mit Rodinal 1+25 um den 60er-Jahre Zeitungsfoto-vintagelook mit ordentlich Korn und knackigen Kontrasten wiederzubeleben. I personally think the grain and contrast is much better. Great shots, Simon!Like the Fomapan better in this sample, but obviously its a matter of tase. Ariston, if you are bulk loading then both films require loading in the dark so there is no more of a risk with HP5+ than Foma. ob es der neue oder der alte APX400 war? [], [] of a film camera as well as film itself, and this meant that my results were not ideal. I started shooting with Kentmere a few months ago, in the hopes that it would provide a cheap, versatile walk-around film for general purpose street photography. TLDR: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better. Thanks! Hopefully this will be apparent when you look at the images below, which you can click on to get a closer look.
I personally enjoy pushing Kentmere and think its forgiving tonal range leads to better images when pushed. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. I actually like to leave this option on when scanning 120, but I think its too aggressive for Kentmere and leaves the grain looking chunky. Deine Erfahrungen beziehen sich vermutlich auf den neuen APX 400.
The images made with that extra stop of light were enough to allow me to settle for [], [] The images above all felt under exposed. Order and structure, vs a more random pattern of sizes. If you need a budget film, Kentmere is your best choice. Grain is just acceptable on 35 mm film and no problem if you are working on medium format. However I still wanted to see whether Fomapan 400 could work for me in any other use cases, and so shot this roll at EI200, one stop overexposed consistently. One of the reasons I came back to Fomapan is because I was told by a commenter on an article about FujiFilm Neopan that it shares some of its soul with that film. 5 Reasons Why You Should Try Fomapan 200. As of October 2021, Tri-X will run you $9.95 a roll for 36 exposures. Both films are a solid choice - try both and see which you like better! Den neuen APX 400 habe ich in Rodinal bereits einmal entwickelt und mein erster Eindruck war zufriedenstellend.
All photos were given the same amount of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the spot healing tool. Having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with the look it can offer, and have a better understanding of its place in my workflow. (meine Frau sagt ja, das sei alles nur Voodoo und dass man das mit dem Kippen auch getrost bleiben lassen oder komplett bertreiben kann.
Tags: Black and White NegativeFomaMedium FormatReview. I only used three cassettes of Fomapan 400 in 135 because shot outside I found it quite grainyhowever shots I made indoors under low light in a church and a museum looked really good. Easy to introduce texture in those areas in a print just by flashing the paper beforehand, if that is something that perticularly worried anyone who doesnt want any areas of pure white on their image. Warum hast den denn den Agfa Kipp verwendet, denn es ist ja vermutlich ein Ilford Film. TLDR: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better. For your last two pictures I can only guess. While we're discussing the Foma/Arista 400, yes it does seem grainy. After digitizing the negatives I import the files into Lightroom, do some basic exposure adjustment, then finish the editing process in Photoshop. Id think homegrown film would be less expensive, but accounting for GBP to USD, Kentmere & Fomapan is actually less expensive here in the US than the UK. The character of these films comes down to a combination of the above factors. Simon, These are great!
East Riffa Al Khalidiyah,
The Minimum Speed Law Says That Quizlet,
Playlist Video Google,
Does Dry Fruits Increase Uric Acid,
Narcissist Happy After Break Up,
Articles F